Replacement compensation can become a contentious issue in divorce, especially when the spouse owns a private business and has the control to set his or her salary, benefits and dividends. When either spouse owns a private business interest, the divorce settlement is only as reasonable as the value of the business and the compensation of its owners.
The amount a spouse takes home from operating a private business may not accurately reflect his or her contribution to the business. Owners may under or over compensate themselves for a variety of reasons. For example, a startup or distressed business may not have enough cash available to pay the owner a full salary. In these situations, owners often have an unwritten understanding that they'll take more pay when business improves.
Perhaps an owner is unaware of how much money he or she could make working in Corporate America, based on years of experience and breadth of responsibilities. Or a C corporation owner might take an above-market salary in lieu of dividends, because the latter is subject to two layers of tax. Some unscrupulous owners even underpay themselves in anticipation of an impending divorce to lower projected maintenance payments.
Whatever the reason, an owner's actual compensation may not reflect what the company would pay an unrelated person to perform the same tasks. Always evaluate owners' compensation levels when either spouse owns a business — an equitable distribution of the marital estate hinges on it.
Many people presume that replacement compensation isn't that big of a deal, because it will all "wash out" in the end. If below-market compensation lowers maintenance payments, won't the value of the business be higher, thereby increasing the value of the marital estate? Not necessarily. Such generalizations can result in unfair settlements. To illustrate, consider the following scenarios:
Example 1: Below-market compensation. You're a private business owner who recently filed for divorce. You've been underpaying yourself for the past three years, because your firm lost a major customer. Your spouse stays at home with the kids and will receive child support and alimony based on a statutory percentage of your annual income. Maintenance payments will probably be set at a lower amount based on your recent below-market compensation. But, you rationalize that's okay, because your marital estate includes the value of your business, which would have been lower if you took a salary commensurate with your contributions to the firm.
Example 2: Above-market compensation. Alternatively, suppose your spouse owns half of a family business with a sibling. You stopped working to raise the kids. Your spouse has temporarily taken a little extra salary to help pay for home improvements and medical costs for his or her parents. You signed a prenuptial agreement that excludes the family business from your marital estate. Unless it's adjusted to market rates, your spouse's above-market compensation will be used to determine your child support and alimony payments, which in your case, will extend until your youngest son graduates college.
Is either of these situations equitable? Maybe not and here's why:
To untangle this confusing situation, it's usually easier to estimate replacement compensation and then adjust the value of the business accordingly. But how much should an owner receive for his or her contribution to the business?
Personal characteristics to consider when quantifying replacement compensation for an owner include:
Company-specific factors that might affect an owner's salary level include:
You also might consider using an approach similar to the IRS's Independent Investor Standard to indirectly determine replacement compensation. This backdoor approach estimates how a hypothetical third-party buyer would compensate an employee if the business were sold. As long as the hypothetical investors would receive a reasonable return on their investments, the IRS presumes owners' compensation is reasonable.
One of the biggest expenses that businesses deduct on their tax returns and financial statements is owners' compensation. Compensation and dividends also factor into maintenance payments. So, getting these numbers right is an important ingredient in an equitable distribution of a marital estate that includes a private business interest. A financial expert is familiar with common sources of reasonable replacement compensation and can help you quantify how much a spouse should receive in salary, benefits and dividends.
Common sources of comparable data you can use to quantify replacement compensation for a spouse include:
Salary data also may be published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, as well as trade associations and executive recruiters.
When comparing multiple sources of compensation data it's imperative to understand the terminology and nuances of each source. For example, some sources just report owners' salaries and bonuses. Others may include such items as payroll taxes, retirement benefits, quasi-business expenses and other perks.
Divorcing spouses may not see eye-to-eye on how to quantify replacement compensation. A financial professional can help provide an unbiased assessment that's supported by objective empirical data.
Get in touch today and find out how we can help you meet your objectives.